Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence as a Methodology for Building Higher-Order Thinking Skills: A Contemporary Educational Perspective

Authors

  • Anas Mahmoud Al-Awatli Al-Rifai Sheikh Noah Al-Qudah Faculty of Sharia and Law, The World Islamic Sciences and Education University (WISE) – Amman – Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2026.8.7.10

Keywords:

Usul al-Fiqh, Usuli Thinking, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Islamic Education

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationship between Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and the science of Usul al-Fiqh (Islamic legal theory), and to examine the potential of employing the cognitive and methodological processes embedded in usuli reasoning to develop higher-order thinking skills among learners. The study was based on the assumption that Usul al-Fiqh is not merely a discipline concerned with regulating the derivation of legal rulings from their detailed evidences; rather, it represents an integrated epistemological framework that encompasses higher-level cognitive processes corresponding to the skills emphasized in contemporary educational literature.   The study adopted the descriptive-analytical method through analyzing educational literature related to higher-order thinking skills, examining the epistemological and methodological structure of Usul al-Fiqh, and identifying the functional correspondences between higher-order cognitive skills and usuli procedures. The study focused on five major skills: analytical thinking, critical thinking, evaluative thinking and decision-making/problem-solving, strategic and foresight thinking, and creative thinking, while highlighting the corresponding usuli mechanisms and their potential educational applications.   The findings revealed clear cognitive and functional intersections between higher-order thinking skills and the mechanisms of usuli reasoning. Issues such as semantic analysis, analogical reasoning (qiyas), verification of the operative cause (tahqiq al-manat), and legal causation (ta‘lil) embody advanced forms of analytical thinking. Meanwhile, methods such as elimination and classification (al-sabr wa al-taqsim), objection, and preference (tarjih) represent applications of critical and evaluative thinking. Discussions of legal consequences (ma’alat) and blocking the means (sadd al-dhara’i‘) reflect strategic and foresight thinking, whereas ijtihad, public interest reasoning (istislah), and refinement of the operative cause (takhrij al-manat) contribute to the development of creative thinking and the generation of solutions for contemporary issues.   The study concluded that Usul al-Fiqh constitutes a rich epistemological and methodological framework that can be utilized to develop higher-order thinking skills, thereby contributing to the improvement of educational curricula and teaching practices while promoting integration between the Islamic intellectual heritage and contemporary educational requirements.

Downloads

Published

09-07-2026

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Anas Mahmoud Al-Awatli Al-Rifai. (2026). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence as a Methodology for Building Higher-Order Thinking Skills: A Contemporary Educational Perspective. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 8(7), 118-135. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2026.8.7.10